A 5‐year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction
Identifieur interne : 009497 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 009496; suivant : 009498A 5‐year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction
Auteurs : I. Naert ; S. Gizani ; M. Vuylsteke ; D. Van Steenberghe [Belgique]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 1999-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Ball group, Baseline, Blackwell science, Catholic university leuven, Dentistry, Denture, Different attachment systems, Edentulous patients, Food impaction, Hyperplasia, Implant, International journal, Least prosthetic complications, Magnet, Magnet group, Mandibular, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Mucositis, Naert, Observation period, Oral pathology, Oral rehabilitation, Other groups, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Prosthesis, Prosthesis installation, Prosthetic, Prosthetic complications, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic outcome, Reference group, Retention force, Same treatment, Second part, Splinted, Third part, Ulcer decubitus, Unsplinted, Unsplinted implants, Whole group, Whole observation period.
- Teeft :
- Ball group, Baseline, Blackwell science, Catholic university leuven, Dentistry, Denture, Different attachment systems, Edentulous patients, Food impaction, Hyperplasia, Implant, International journal, Least prosthetic complications, Magnet, Magnet group, Mandibular, Maxillofacial, Maxillofacial implants, Maxillofacial surgery, Mucositis, Naert, Observation period, Oral pathology, Oral rehabilitation, Other groups, Overdenture, Overdentures, Patient satisfaction, Prosthesis, Prosthesis installation, Prosthetic, Prosthetic complications, Prosthetic dentistry, Prosthetic outcome, Reference group, Retention force, Same treatment, Second part, Splinted, Third part, Ulcer decubitus, Unsplinted, Unsplinted implants, Whole group, Whole observation period.
Abstract
Prosthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated in order to investigate whether there is a need or advantage to splint two implants in the mandible retaining a hinging overdenture. This study included 36 fully edentulous patients randomly divided into three groups according to the attachment system they received: magnets, ball attachments or straight bars (reference group). None of the implants failed during the whole observation period in any of the groups. After 5 years of observation, the Bar group presented the highest retention capacity and the least prosthetic complications but revealed more mucositis and gingival hyperplasia. Patient satisfaction rated similar for all groups although the Magnet group showed lower retention forces. All patients would repeat the same treatment even though the majority of the Magnet group would prefer a more retentive solution because of limited denture stability.
Url:
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000E04
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000E04
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 004368
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 009923
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 009497
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A 5‐year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gizani, S" sort="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S" first="S." last="Gizani">S. Gizani</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vuylsteke, M" sort="Vuylsteke, M" uniqKey="Vuylsteke M" first="M." last="Vuylsteke">M. Vuylsteke</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:1C44077F5AE800B3C8E017794D26899FA6251614</idno>
<date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/1C44077F5AE800B3C8E017794D26899FA6251614/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000E04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000E04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000E04</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">004368</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">004368</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:1999:Naert I:a:year:prospective</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">009923</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">009497</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">009497</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">A 5‐year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction</title>
<author><name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Leuven;</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gizani, S" sort="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S" first="S." last="Gizani">S. Gizani</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Leuven;</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vuylsteke, M" sort="Vuylsteke, M" uniqKey="Vuylsteke M" first="M." last="Vuylsteke">M. Vuylsteke</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">and</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Belgique</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Leuven</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">26</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="195">195</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="202">202</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1999-03">1999-03</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Ball group</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Blackwell science</term>
<term>Catholic university leuven</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Food impaction</term>
<term>Hyperplasia</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Least prosthetic complications</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet group</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Mucositis</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Oral pathology</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Other groups</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthesis installation</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic complications</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic outcome</term>
<term>Reference group</term>
<term>Retention force</term>
<term>Same treatment</term>
<term>Second part</term>
<term>Splinted</term>
<term>Third part</term>
<term>Ulcer decubitus</term>
<term>Unsplinted</term>
<term>Unsplinted implants</term>
<term>Whole group</term>
<term>Whole observation period</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Ball group</term>
<term>Baseline</term>
<term>Blackwell science</term>
<term>Catholic university leuven</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Different attachment systems</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>Food impaction</term>
<term>Hyperplasia</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Least prosthetic complications</term>
<term>Magnet</term>
<term>Magnet group</term>
<term>Mandibular</term>
<term>Maxillofacial</term>
<term>Maxillofacial implants</term>
<term>Maxillofacial surgery</term>
<term>Mucositis</term>
<term>Naert</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Oral pathology</term>
<term>Oral rehabilitation</term>
<term>Other groups</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Overdentures</term>
<term>Patient satisfaction</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthesis installation</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic complications</term>
<term>Prosthetic dentistry</term>
<term>Prosthetic outcome</term>
<term>Reference group</term>
<term>Retention force</term>
<term>Same treatment</term>
<term>Second part</term>
<term>Splinted</term>
<term>Third part</term>
<term>Ulcer decubitus</term>
<term>Unsplinted</term>
<term>Unsplinted implants</term>
<term>Whole group</term>
<term>Whole observation period</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Prosthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated in order to investigate whether there is a need or advantage to splint two implants in the mandible retaining a hinging overdenture. This study included 36 fully edentulous patients randomly divided into three groups according to the attachment system they received: magnets, ball attachments or straight bars (reference group). None of the implants failed during the whole observation period in any of the groups. After 5 years of observation, the Bar group presented the highest retention capacity and the least prosthetic complications but revealed more mucositis and gingival hyperplasia. Patient satisfaction rated similar for all groups although the Magnet group showed lower retention forces. All patients would repeat the same treatment even though the majority of the Magnet group would prefer a more retentive solution because of limited denture stability.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Gizani, S" sort="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S" first="S." last="Gizani">S. Gizani</name>
<name sortKey="Naert, I" sort="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I" first="I." last="Naert">I. Naert</name>
<name sortKey="Vuylsteke, M" sort="Vuylsteke, M" uniqKey="Vuylsteke M" first="M." last="Vuylsteke">M. Vuylsteke</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Belgique"><noRegion><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D." last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 009497 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 009497 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:1C44077F5AE800B3C8E017794D26899FA6251614 |texte= A 5‐year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |